DRY SLOTS ALONG THE I-95 CORRIDOR:
DC TO BOSTON
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAPHAEL MIRANDA
Forecasting snowfall amounts along the I-95 Corridor from Washington DC to Boston always presents a challenge. It
is of course the most populated stretch of highway in the United States, so there is an extra reason to get it
right. When so many millions of people are going to be hanging on your every word, accuracy is highly
desired. By nature of its location, each winter storm, or Nor'easter, presents a set of variables that
could have a large range of results. In order to produce significant snowfall amounts, a few
factors must be in place; cold air, abundant moisture supply, and a prolonged precipitation event.
Many winters, including the 2007-2008 winter have seen these ingredients fail to come together
at the right time. Sometimes there is an extended arctic outbreak, but it is simply a cold dry
air-mass and no storms are present. The other snow-less scenario takes place when there is
cold air in place, and a storm develops, but the Low Pressure tracks too far to the west, bringing
in copious moisture, but also abundant warm air advection because the ocean is typically much
warmer than land during the winter. Low pressure that tracks too far to the west, it brings
an onshore flow, setting the stage for a cold rain from Philadelphia to Boston. Another
snow-buster that can disrupt a snowfall forecast even if all the ingredients seem to be
coming together is the dry slot. The dry slot is defined as the cloudless region between
the head and tail is produced by dry air descending from aloft that causes evaporation.
Depending on the size and location of the dry slot, a snowfall forecast in the
Northeast can be drastically affected.
Every winter, meteorologists are given the chance to forecast snowfall around the big cities of the
Northeast. Mid-latitude cyclones, also known as "Nor'easters", are more common in the winter months
than any other time of the year. Snowfall can happen from fall to spring in the Northeast, but
typically most snow events occur between December and February. Each mid-latitude cyclone presents
this problem, because the dry slot is a feature of all Mid-Latitude cyclones. Sometimes the dry
slot can quickly "fill in" if the low intensifies and moisture wraps all the way around the center
of circulation, but this is not always the case.
The consequences of a dry slot invasion are broad and can truly be a forecast buster. The problem with
forecasting snowfall is that the public wants to know exactly how much snow they will have to shovel
off their cars, or if they should stay home from work because of an 8" snowfall during the day. Meteorologists
will use various model data, including QPF data to come up with a snowfall amount. The potential problem
exists when all the models point to over a foot of snow for a given area, and it makes sense to agree
with this forecast and put it out to the public. If a dry slot happens to form over the mid-Atlantic
coastline during the intensification of the low, which is often the case, than instead of over
a foot of snow, the most populated regions might only see 6-8". This forecast would be a bust,
and the public would be angry. The problem is that dry air can affect a small area, so that
over Long Island where the dry slot might not have an influence, the storm totals would pan
out and the 12"+ forecast would be spot on, but in Manhattan and Brooklyn, where the dry
slot appeared during some of the heaviest precipitation, the residents would think that
the storm never happened.
A Nor'easter is a fun and challenging storm to watch develop for several reasons. It usually involves
two low pressure systems, one that moves northeastward from the gulf region, and a secondary low that
forms somewhere off the coast of the mid-Atlantic. This transference of energy makes is a very
dynamic event. Besides the energy aspect of the storm, the rapid intensification is often very
impressive. When pressure levels drop more than 24 milibars per 24 hours, we say the storm is
"bombing" out. This can mean huge snowfall totals for lots of folks. What makes the storm so
fun to watch is also what makes the dry slot effect more pronounced. Although these winter
storms can seem like a long drawn out event, sometimes the actual snow event is rather brief,
when considering the amount of snow forecasted. There is usually a window of a few hours
when the heaviest snow will occur over any given location. If a dry slot happens to form
over the forecast area during this window, the effect can be detrimental to a storm. Snowfall
rates of 2-3" per hour are common with these storms, and sometimes it only takes a good 4-6
hours of snow to leave a huge impact, but if dry air moves in to the storm for even only 2
hours of the heaviest snow, this can cut final accumulations in half.
It is never easy to forecast snowfall totals for these winter storms along the I-95 corridor. One has
to be constantly checking radar and satellite to monitor the formation of the low and the structure
of the storm. The radar will aide the meteorologist in determining where the heaviest snowfall is
occurring and the satellite imagery will point out where any dry air is invading the storm. When
dealing with the dry slot one must constantly monitor the storm in order to produce an accurate
snowfall forecast. A lot of "Nowcasting" is involved. If I were to forecast snowfall totals
for an intensifying Nor'easter and I noticed a dry slot showing up around the DC area, I would
have to take this into account. One must constantly check satellite and radar to see if the
dry slot is eroding the precip away, or if it is filling in. The trickiest thing about
this is that the dry slot behavior could rapidly change. The forecaster must adapt his/her
forecast as the storm develops, so if a dry slot seems to be expanding, one might cut
forecast totals in half. The problem with this is that the dry slot could fill in and
then the totals might rebound towards the higher original amounts. It is definitely a
"wait and see" situation where intuition and experience would be a huge benefit.
I sat down with Meteorologist Jim Nichols to discuss his experience forecasting with winter storms and dry
slots. When I asked him when he has ever had to deal with the issue of a dry slot affecting snow totals
his response was "it is a problem with every winter storm in New Jersey". He recalled a winter storm
during his college days where fistfights broke out regarding snowfall forecasts. Jim has been
forecasting in the Philadelphia area for several years, and he has experience with dry air completely
busting a forecast. The Nor'easter of March 2001 was originally forecast to be a monster snowmaker
from North of DC all the way to Boston, but dry air worked its way into the storm and the snow never
materialized. In the end instead of picking up over a foot of snow as predicted, residents were
left with just over an inch. Furious, viewers demanded blood and blood was let, jobs were lost
and this blunder will be remembered for a long time in Philadelphia.
When forecasting around the dry slot, there are a couple of tools a meteorologist can use. The fact that
the public is used to receiving ranges for snowfall totals is beneficial. In some cases a range of 3-6"
will be sufficient to account for the dry air limiting snow totals. The problem with these ranges is
the public often focuses on the upper limit, and ignores the lower limit. So even if a storm is forecast
to dump 4-8" and most people see 4", there is a tendency for the public say, "I thought we were
supposed to get 8"!"
To better forecast in this situation, understanding and using satellite data are essential. It is not
enough to make your snowfall forecast and let the storm unfold. One must constantly check the available
imagery to see when and where dry slot formation occurs, and how the storm is developing as a whole.
This type of forecasting might require a sleepless night, but should improve the accuracy of
snow totals. Also, there is something to be said for experience and intuition in this case. There
is no substitute for having been through a situation before, and years of experience forecasting
these storms can only help one recognize the patterns of dry slots.
WORKS CITED
1. Interview with Jim Nichols, Meteorologist NBC Weatherplus. April 2008.
2. Lutgens, Frederick K, and Tarbuck, Edward W. The Atmosphere Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
|
|
|